Advanced Machine Learning Models for Risk-Based Pricing in Health Insurance: Techniques and Applications

Authors

  • Bhavani Prasad Kasaraneni Independent Researcher, USA Author

Keywords:

Risk-based pricing, Health insurance

Abstract

The escalating costs of healthcare pose a significant challenge to the sustainability of health insurance systems globally. In this context, accurate risk assessment is crucial for insurance companies to establish fair and competitive pricing structures. Traditional risk-based pricing models, primarily reliant on demographic factors such as age, gender, and geographic location, are increasingly deemed insufficient due to their limitations in capturing the complex interplay of individual health characteristics and healthcare utilization patterns. These traditional models often suffer from data sparsity, where limited data on individual health history can lead to inaccurate risk profiles. Additionally, selection bias can arise when healthier individuals are more likely to self-select into insurance plans, skewing the overall risk pool and making it difficult to accurately price for high-risk individuals. Furthermore, traditional models struggle to capture non-linear relationships between health factors and healthcare costs. For instance, the presence of multiple chronic conditions can interact synergistically to significantly increase healthcare expenditures, a complexity that traditional models often fail to account for.

This research delves into the application of advanced machine learning (ML) models for enhanced risk-based pricing in health insurance. We explore a range of sophisticated ML techniques, including gradient boosting, deep neural networks, and recurrent neural networks, with a focus on their potential to improve pricing accuracy and fairness.

The paper commences with a comprehensive review of the limitations inherent in conventional risk-based pricing methodologies. We delve into the challenges associated with data sparsity, selection bias, and the inability to effectively capture non-linear relationships between health factors and healthcare costs. Subsequently, we present a detailed exposition of advanced ML models, highlighting their unique capabilities in addressing these limitations. Gradient boosting algorithms, such as XGBoost, offer exceptional interpretability and resilience to overfitting, making them well-suited for risk assessment in insurance settings. Their ability to combine the predictions of multiple weak decision trees into a robust final model enhances accuracy and reduces the risk of the model learning spurious patterns from the data. Deep neural networks, with their ability to learn complex non-linear relationships from vast datasets, provide a powerful tool for modeling healthcare cost drivers. Deep neural networks can learn intricate patterns from a wide range of data sources, including electronic health records, pharmacy claims, and wearable device data, enabling them to capture the nuanced interplay between various health factors that contribute to healthcare costs. Recurrent neural networks, particularly Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, demonstrate exceptional proficiency in handling sequential data, enabling them to effectively capture the temporal dynamics of healthcare utilization patterns. LSTMs possess an internal memory mechanism that allows them to learn long-term dependencies within sequences, making them ideal for modeling healthcare utilization patterns, which often exhibit temporal trends. For instance, an LSTM network can effectively capture how a hospitalization in one year can influence healthcare costs in subsequent years.

The core of the research involves the application and comparative analysis of these advanced ML models on a real-world health insurance claims dataset. We meticulously outline the data pre-processing steps, encompassing feature engineering techniques tailored to enhance model performance. Feature engineering encompasses data cleaning, normalization, and the creation of new features that capture the interactions between various health factors. For instance, we might create a new feature representing the co-occurrence of specific chronic conditions, as this can significantly impact healthcare costs. Subsequently, we delve into the model training process, employing robust cross-validation techniques to prevent overfitting and ensure generalizability. The performance of each model is rigorously evaluated using established metrics, such as Mean Squared Error (MSE), R-squared, and Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) for models predicting healthcare expenditures.

A pivotal aspect of the research centers on the critical issue of fairness in risk-based pricing. We meticulously examine the potential for bias within ML models, particularly with regards to protected characteristics such as race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Techniques such as fairness-aware model selection and counterfactual analysis are explored for mitigating bias and ensuring equitable pricing across diverse populations. The interpretability of models plays a crucial role in achieving fairness. We discuss methods like feature importance scores and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values to elucidate the rationale behind model predictions and identify potential biases. By understanding how different features contribute to the model's output, we can identify and address potential biases that may lead to unfair pricing practices.

Through a comprehensive analysis of the results, the research aims to identify the most effective advanced ML model for risk-based pricing in health insurance, considering both accuracy and fairness. The findings will contribute valuable insights for insurance companies seeking to implement robust and equitable pricing strategies. Additionally, the research furthers the understanding of the intricate relationship between health factors, healthcare utilization, and healthcare costs, paving the way for advancements in healthcare policy and resource allocation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jiang, F., Ye, N., Xu, X., Wang, Y., & Xue, C. (2017, August). An intelligent healthcare risk assessment system using machine learning techniques. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) (pp. 142-147). IEEE. [DOI: 10.1109/CSE.2017.142]

Luo, W., Liu, H., Liu, J., & Xiao, Y. (2018, December). Deep learning for personalized healthcare information retrieval. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 2740-2746). IEEE. [DOI: 10.1109/BigData.2018.8622402]

Ahmad, A., Guo, Y., Xing, M., & Qin, J. (2019, July). A survey on machine learning techniques applied to electronic health records. IEEE Access, 7, 86336-86358. [DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2930442]

Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Charlton, S., Parekh, M., McLaughlin, H., Oehrlich, J., ... & Jha, A. K. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage heart failure in the US. Science, 366(6464), 447-453. [DOI: 10.1126/science.aax5849]

Bolukbasi, H., Chang, K. W., Gebhardt, J., Ganesh, S. E., & Etal, A. (2016). A demonstration of fair machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.07855.

Caruana, R., Louzoun, Y., Thomas, L., & Varshney, N. (2018). Making machine learning fair and accountable. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.09821.

Celis, L. E., Calfat, A., Huang, S. W., & Agarwal, S. (2019). Fairness in machine learning: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.09823.

Friedler, N., Pleiss, G., Sonenberg, J., Sandra, S., & Alan, T. (2019). Discriminatory machine learning is a violation of human rights. Communications of the ACM, 62(9), 109-118. [DOI: 10.1145/3351097]

Kusner, M., Loftus, J., Russell, C., & List, R. (2017). Algorithmic fairness under unawareness. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 173-178).

Zhang, B. H., Lemoine, B., & Mitchell, M. (2018). Mitigating unfairness in direct marketing. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 297-307).

Edmonds, A., & Freedman, S. (2018). Counterfactual fairness. In Proceedings of the NeurIPS Workshop on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 1-10).

Bechamp, F., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2019). Debiasing machine learning for healthcare using generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.02228.

Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 4768-4777).

Montavon, G., Samek, W., Kern, M., Lapuschkin, S., Binder, A., Bachs, P., & Muller, K. R.

Downloads

Published

11-02-2021

How to Cite

[1]
Bhavani Prasad Kasaraneni, “Advanced Machine Learning Models for Risk-Based Pricing in Health Insurance: Techniques and Applications ”, Australian Journal of Machine Learning Research & Applications, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 170–207, Feb. 2021, Accessed: Dec. 23, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://sydneyacademics.com/index.php/ajmlra/article/view/134

Similar Articles

1-10 of 104

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.