Optimizing Deep Learning Models for Edge Computing: Techniques for Efficient Inference, Model Compression, and Real-Time Processing

Authors

  • Nischay Reddy Mitta Independent Researcher, USA Author

Keywords:

deep learning, model optimization

Abstract

The burgeoning proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and the exponential growth in data volume necessitate a paradigm shift towards decentralized intelligence at the network edge. Deep learning models, while achieving unprecedented performance on a multitude of tasks, present significant challenges when deployed on resource-constrained edge devices. This research investigates techniques for optimizing deep learning models for efficient execution within the confines of edge computing environments. Our primary focus lies in meticulously investigating and combining state-of-the-art techniques to address the critical issues of computational efficiency, memory footprint, and latency.

The paper commences with a comprehensive overview of the edge computing paradigm and its distinctive characteristics, emphasizing the stark contrast with cloud-centric architectures. We delve into the intrinsic limitations of edge devices, including constrained processing power, limited memory capacity, and energy budgets, underscoring the imperative for model optimization. A systematic exploration of efficient inference techniques ensues, encompassing hardware acceleration, quantization, and knowledge distillation. These methodologies are meticulously analyzed in terms of their impact on model accuracy, computational complexity, memory utilization, and their suitability for various edge deployment scenarios. Hardware acceleration, for instance, leverages specialized hardware components, such as GPUs or neural processing units (NPUs), to expedite the execution of computationally intensive deep learning operations. Quantization techniques reduce the precision of the weights and activations within a deep learning model, leading to significant reductions in model size and memory footprint, while potentially incurring minimal accuracy degradation. Knowledge distillation, on the other hand, involves training a smaller, more efficient model (student) to mimic the behavior of a larger, pre-trained model (teacher). This technique effectively compresses the knowledge encapsulated within the teacher model into a more compact student model, enabling efficient inference on edge devices.

Model compression emerges as a pivotal strategy to mitigate the resource constraints imposed by edge devices. We scrutinize a diverse array of compression techniques, including pruning, low-rank factorization, and Huffman coding, providing a comparative analysis of their efficacy in reducing model size and preserving performance. Pruning, for example, involves removing redundant or insignificant connections within a deep learning model, resulting in a sparser network with reduced computational complexity. Low-rank factorization techniques decompose the weight tensors within a model into a product of smaller matrices, effectively reducing the number of parameters and memory footprint without compromising accuracy. Huffman coding, a well-established technique in data compression, can be employed to represent the weights and activations of a deep learning model more efficiently, leading to further reductions in model size. Moreover, the paper investigates the interplay between model compression and quantization, exploring their synergistic potential for achieving substantial reductions in model complexity. By strategically combining these techniques, we can achieve significant compression ratios while maintaining acceptable levels of accuracy, paving the way for the deployment of deep learning models on edge devices with limited resources.

Real-time processing is a paramount requirement for numerous edge computing applications, particularly those involving autonomous systems or human-in-the-loop interactions. We examine techniques for accelerating inference, such as model partitioning, pipelining, and asynchronous computation, with a focus on minimizing latency while maintaining accuracy. Model partitioning involves strategically dividing a deep learning model into smaller sub-models that can be executed concurrently on multiple processing cores or specialized hardware. Pipelining entails overlapping the execution of different stages within the deep learning inference pipeline, improving efficiency by exploiting the inherent parallelism of deep learning computations. Asynchronous computation techniques enable the model to process incoming data streams without being blocked by I/O operations, further reducing latency. The paper also explores the integration of hardware-software co-design principles to optimize the execution of deep learning models on edge devices. Hardware-software co-design fosters a collaborative approach where hardware and software are designed in tandem, enabling the development of specialized hardware architectures and software optimizations that are tailored to the specific requirements of deep learning algorithms.

To ground the theoretical underpinnings in practical applications, we present comprehensive case studies demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed optimization techniques across diverse domains. These case studies encompass image classification, object detection, and natural language processing tasks, providing empirical evidence of the performance gains achieved in terms of reduced latency, memory footprint, and power consumption.

In conclusion, this research offers a holistic approach to optimizing deep learning models for edge computing, providing valuable insights and practical guidance for researchers and practitioners alike. By effectively addressing the challenges posed by resource-constrained environments, this work contributes to the advancement of edge intelligence and its widespread adoption across various industries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J. Singh, “Autonomous Vehicle Swarm Robotics: Real-Time Coordination Using AI for Urban Traffic and Fleet Management”, Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–44, Aug. 2023

Amish Doshi, “Integrating Reinforcement Learning into Business Process Mining for Continuous Process Adaptation and Optimization”, J. Computational Intel. & Robotics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 69–79, Jul. 2022

Saini, Vipin, Dheeraj Kumar Dukhiram Pal, and Sai Ganesh Reddy. "Data Quality Assurance Strategies In Interoperable Health Systems." Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 2.2 (2022): 322-359.

Gadhiraju, Asha. "Regulatory Compliance in Medical Devices: Ensuring Quality, Safety, and Risk Management in Healthcare." Journal of Deep Learning in Genomic Data Analysis 3.2 (2023): 23-64.

Tamanampudi, Venkata Mohit. "NLP-Powered ChatOps: Automating DevOps Collaboration Using Natural Language Processing for Real-Time Incident Resolution." Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research and Applications 1.1 (2021): 530-567.

Amish Doshi. “Hybrid Machine Learning and Process Mining for Predictive Business Process Automation”. Journal of Science & Technology, vol. 3, no. 6, Nov. 2022, pp. 42-52, https://thesciencebrigade.com/jst/article/view/480

J. Singh, “Advancements in AI-Driven Autonomous Robotics: Leveraging Deep Learning for Real-Time Decision Making and Object Recognition”, J. of Artificial Int. Research and App., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 657–697, Apr. 2023

Tamanampudi, Venkata Mohit. "Natural Language Processing in DevOps Documentation: Streamlining Automation and Knowledge Management in Enterprise Systems." Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery 1.1 (2021): 146-185.

Gadhiraju, Asha. "Best Practices for Clinical Quality Assurance: Ensuring Safety, Compliance, and Continuous Improvement." Journal of AI in Healthcare and Medicine 3.2 (2023): 186-226.

Downloads

Published

18-12-2023

How to Cite

[1]
Nischay Reddy Mitta, “Optimizing Deep Learning Models for Edge Computing: Techniques for Efficient Inference, Model Compression, and Real-Time Processing ”, Australian Journal of Machine Learning Research & Applications, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 707–745, Dec. 2023, Accessed: Dec. 12, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://sydneyacademics.com/index.php/ajmlra/article/view/207

Similar Articles

41-50 of 136

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.