Advanced Performance Tuning of Oracle Databases with Machine Learning Algorithms
Keywords:
Oracle Database, Machine LearningAbstract
The data explosion and growing complexity of the modern-day database system have made performance tuning a paramount task in database management. Most of the traditional performance tuning methods that rely very commonly on manual interventions, rule-based heuristics, and reactive strategies fall short on a great deal of the new, dynamic, and multifaceted problems facing today's database environment. These approaches have diminished in their effectiveness at addressing large-scale systems' demands in real time, and as a result, create inefficiencies, performance bottlenecks, and higher operational costs.
The purpose of this paper is to expound on how the application of machine learning (ML) and data science techniques has transformative possibilities for Oracle database management. The paper will concentrate on three primary applications of the technologies investigated: (1) examining concurrent processes and resource utilization for analyzing inefficiencies and contention points, (2) Predicting performance issues before they arise to allow for timely intervention, and (3) dynamic resource allocation to ensure a balance and efficient system operation. The incorporation of the above ML algorithms into the scope of database management further allows DBAs to shift from the reactive mindset of troubleshooting toward active performance optimization, thus greatly augmenting reliability and efficiency.
The paper describes a broad architecture for the solution evidencing the actual operationalization of ML-enhanced performance tuning for Oracle databases. This architecture can be substantiated through detailed pseudocode, flowcharts, and visualizations that create a clear path to an implementation baseline ready for DBAs and data scientists. The proposed framework aims to exploit advanced ML methods, which include decision trees, neural networks, and reinforcement learning, to analyze performance data, predict incoming issues, and allocate resources intelligently.
The scientific findings of the research demonstrate the vision machine learning beholds in turning around database performance tuning. With the data-driven approach and lure, organizations might reasonably aspire to see very vast improvements in query execution time, resource utilization, and global system performance. The paper discusses not only ML-based performance tuning advantages but also implementation challenges and limitations, depicting the path toward best practices for real-life adoption. This research, therefore, aims to draw a parallel line between theoretical advancement in machine learning and its practical applicability in database management, drawing a roadmap for the future of intelligent and autonomous database systems.
Downloads
References
. Marcus, R., Papaemmanouil, O.: Deep reinforcement learning for join order enumeration. arXiv:1803.00055 (2018)
. Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Graves, A., Antonoglou, I., Wierstra, D., Riedmiller, M.A.: Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv:1312.5602 (2013)
. Ortiz, J., Balazinska, M., Gehrke, J., Keerthi, S.S.: Learning state representations for query optimization with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv:1803.08604 (2018)
. Richter, S., Quiané-Ruiz, JA., Schuh, S. et al. Towards zero-overhead static and adaptive indexing in Hadoop. The VLDB Journal 23, 469–494 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-013-0332-z
. Lillicrap, T.P., Hunt, J.J., Pritzel, A. et al.: Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv:1509.02971 (2015)
. Bandle M, Giceva J, Neumann T. To partition or not to partition, that is the join question in a real system. ACM SIGMOD. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448016.3452831.
. Duggan J, Cetintemel U, Papaemmanouil O, Upfal E. Performance prediction for concurrent database workloads. ACM SIGMOD. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1145/1989323.1989359.
. Han Y, et al. Cardinality estimation in dbms: a comprehensive benchmark evaluation. arXiv preprint. 2021. https://doi.org/10.4855/arXiv.2109.05877.
. Hester T, et al. Deep Q-learning from demonstrations. AAAI. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11757.
. Kim C, et al. FAST: fast architecture-sensitive tree search on modern CPUs and GPUs. ACM SIGMOD. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1145/1807167.1807206.
. Kipf A, Kipf T, Radke B, Leis V, Boncz PA, Kemper A. Learned cardinalities: estimating correlated joins with deep learning. CIDR. 2019. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1809.00677.
. Krishnan S, Yang Z, Goldberg K, Hellerstein JM, Stoica I. Learning to optimize join queries with deep reinforcement learning. CoRR. 2018. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1808.03196.
. Kristo A, Vaidya K, Çetintemel U, Misra S, Kraska T. The case for a learned sorting algorithm. ACM SIGMOD. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3318464.3389752.
. Marcus R, et al. Bao: making learned query optimization practical. ACM SIGMOD. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448016.3452838.
. Marcus R, Papaemmanouil O. Towards a hands-free query optimizer through deep learning. arXiv. 2018. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1809.10212.
. Marcus R, Papaemmanouil O. Plan-structured deep neural network models for query performance prediction. arXiv. 2019. https://doi.org/10.14778/3342263.3342646.
. Marcus R, Negi P, Mao H, Zhang C, Alizadeh M, Kraska T, Papaemmanouil O. Neo: a learned query optimizer. Proc VLDB Endow. 2019. https://doi.org/10.14778/3342263.3342644.
. Mudgal S, et al. Deep learning for entity matching. ACM SIGMOD. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183713.3196926.
. Nathan V, Ding J, Alizadeh M, Kraska T. Learning multi-dimensional indexes. ACM SIGMOD. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3318464.3380579.
. Ortiz J, Balazinska M, Gehrke J, Keerthi SS. Learning state representations for query optimization with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209889.3209890.
. Sabek I, Ukyab TS, Kraska T. LSched: a workload-aware learned query scheduler for analytical database systems. ACM SIGMOD. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1145/3514221.3526158.
. Tobin J, Fong R, Ray A, Schneider J, Zaremba W, Abbeel P. Domain randomization for transferring deep neural networks from simulation to the real world. arXiv. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2017.8202133.
