Data Mesh Best Practices: Governance, Domains, and Data Products

Authors

  • Naresh Dulam Vice President Sr Lead Software Engineer, JP Morgan Chase, USA Author
  • Abhilash Katari Engineering Lead, Persistent Systems Inc, USA Author
  • Venkataramana Gosukonda Senior Software Engineering Manager, Wells Fargo, USA Author

Keywords:

Data Mesh, data domains, decentralized data architecture

Abstract

Data Mesh is revolutionizing how organizations approach data architecture by addressing the challenges of scalability, agility, and centralized bottlenecks inherent in traditional data platforms. Rooted in decentralization, Data Mesh shifts ownership and responsibility to domain-oriented teams, empowering them to manage data as a product focusing on usability, accessibility, and value. At its core, Data Mesh is built on three key pillars: governance, domains, and data products. Governance ensures that standards, compliance, and security are consistently upheld without stifling innovation, relying on automated policies and tooling to enforce consistency across decentralized teams. Domains enable teams with the most profound understanding of their data to take ownership, fostering accountability & eliminating delays caused by relying on centralized data teams. Treating data as a product shifts the perspective to prioritize the end consumer's needs, ensuring that data is discoverable, reliable, and purpose-built for solving business challenges. Implementing Data Mesh requires more than technical changes; it demands a cultural shift where domain teams are empowered and supported with the right tools, practices, and training. Organizations must define clear domain boundaries, create reusable & interoperable data products, and invest in infrastructure that supports self-service data management and real-time monitoring. Effective governance should be embedded into the process with automation, ensuring that policies are enforced seamlessly without adding overhead. Collaboration between domains is equally critical to avoid the creation of new silos, requiring strong communication channels & shared standards. By fostering a product mindset, teams can continuously improve their data offerings, respond to feedback, and evolve with business needs. As organizations transition to Data Mesh, they must prioritize scalability, interoperability, and robust automation to maintain efficiency while unlocking the full potential of decentralized data management. This approach addresses traditional bottlenecks and empowers teams to innovate and deliver value faster. By embracing the principles of Data Mesh and adopting practical best practices, organizations can create a resilient and adaptive data ecosystem that supports their long-term goals while ensuring the scalability and agility needed in today's fast-paced digital landscape.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tautges, T. J., Ernst, C., Stimpson, C., Meyers, R. J., & Merkley, K. (2004). MOAB: a mesh-oriented database (No. SAND2004-1592). Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), Albuquerque, NM, and Livermore, CA (United States).

Devine, K., Boman, E., Heaphy, R., Hendrickson, B., & Vaughan, C. (2002). Zoltan data management services for parallel dynamic applications. Computing in Science & Engineering, 4(2), 90-96.

Liaw, S. T., Rahimi, A., Ray, P., Taggart, J., Dennis, S., de Lusignan, S., ... & Talaei-Khoei, A. (2013). Towards an ontology for data quality in integrated chronic disease management: a realist review of the literature. International journal of medical informatics, 82(1), 10-24.

Rasmussen, M. H., Lefrançois, M., Schneider, G. F., & Pauwels, P. (2021). BOT: The building topology ontology of the W3C linked building data group. Semantic Web, 12(1), 143-161.

Kaisler, S., Armour, F., Espinosa, J. A., & Money, W. (2013, January). Big data: Issues and challenges moving forward. In 2013 46th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 995-1004). IEEE.

Kostić, D., Rodriguez, A., Albrecht, J., & Vahdat, A. (2003, October). Bullet: High bandwidth data dissemination using an overlay mesh. In Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles (pp. 282-297).

Gray, J., Liu, D. T., Nieto-Santisteban, M., Szalay, A., DeWitt, D. J., & Heber, G. (2005). Scientific data management in the coming decade. Acm Sigmod Record, 34(4), 34-41.

Perera, C., Qin, Y., Estrella, J. C., Reiff-Marganiec, S., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2017). Fog computing for sustainable smart cities: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50(3), 1-43.

Slama, D., Puhlmann, F., Morrish, J., & Bhatnagar, R. M. (2015). Enterprise IoT: Strategies and Best practices for connected products and services. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".

DeVito, Z., Joubert, N., Palacios, F., Oakley, S., Medina, M., Barrientos, M., ... & Hanrahan, P. (2011, November). Liszt: a domain specific language for building portable mesh-based PDE solvers. In Proceedings of 2011 international conference for high performance computing, networking, storage and analysis (pp. 1-12).

Sarker, K. U., Deraman, A. B., Hasan, R., & Abbas, A. (2019). Ontological practice for big data management. International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems, 8(03), 265-273.

Chan, W., Gomez, R., Rogers, S., & Buning, P. (2002, June). Best practices in overset grid generation. In 32nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit (p. 3191).

Wyatt, J. C., & Liu, J. L. (2002). Basic concepts in medical informatics. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 56(11), 808-812.

Thumburu, S. K. R. (2021). Data Analysis Best Practices for EDI Migration Success. MZ Computing Journal, 2(1).

Thumburu, S. K. R. (2021). The Future of EDI Standards in an API-Driven World. MZ Computing Journal, 2(2).

Gade, K. R. (2021). Cost Optimization Strategies for Cloud Migrations. MZ Computing Journal, 2(2).

Gade, K. R. (2021). Cloud Migration: Challenges and Best Practices for Migrating Legacy Systems to the Cloud. Innovative Engineering Sciences Journal, 1(1).

Katari, A., Muthsyala, A., & Allam, H. HYBRID CLOUD ARCHITECTURES FOR FINANCIAL DATA LAKES: DESIGN PATTERNS AND USE CASES.

Katari, A. Conflict Resolution Strategies in Financial Data Replication Systems.

Katari, A., & Rallabhandi, R. S. DELTA LAKE IN FINTECH: ENHANCING DATA LAKE RELIABILITY WITH ACID TRANSACTIONS.

Komandla, V. Strategic Feature Prioritization: Maximizing Value through User-Centric Roadmaps.

Komandla, V. Enhancing Security and Fraud Prevention in Fintech: Comprehensive Strategies for Secure Online Account Opening.

Thumburu, S. K. R. (2020). Enhancing Data Compliance in EDI Transactions. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 6(1).

Thumburu, S. K. R. (2020). Leveraging APIs in EDI Migration Projects. MZ Computing Journal, 1(1).

Gade, K. R. (2020). Data Mesh Architecture: A Scalable and Resilient Approach to Data Management. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 6(1).

Downloads

Published

11-05-2022

How to Cite

[1]
Naresh Dulam, Abhilash Katari, and Venkataramana Gosukonda, “Data Mesh Best Practices: Governance, Domains, and Data Products”, Australian Journal of Machine Learning Research & Applications, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 524–547, May 2022, Accessed: Dec. 23, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://sydneyacademics.com/index.php/ajmlra/article/view/210

Similar Articles

61-70 of 145

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.